Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Remembering the victims of the 2013 Boston Marathon


I hope everyone had a very happy Easter.  As my last few weeks here in Ireland commence, I want to examine a few final comparisons between American and Irish sports media coverage.  Today, in particular, is a significant day for all Americans as the Boston Marathon kicks off.

Nobody will forget the horrifying events that transpired last year, and while Americans were the ones mainly affected, the Irish followed the story as well. Upon opening today’s RTÉ Newspaper and going online to cnn.com, I was struck by the fact that both countries had major articles surrounding today’s event.  This wouldn’t happen in America so, to me, it shows why America gets the stereotype that it does.  If something tragic were to happen in Ireland, I guarantee that local and national news would report it in the states, but I can almost guarantee with the same amount of certainty that it wouldn’t be covered the following year.  It therefore makes sense that American’s are viewed as “stuck up” and that we don’t see anything beyond our borders.  While I cannot change the whole country, I have learned this semester about the importance of keeping up with international news and I will continue to follow what is happening in Ireland.








What I find most interesting about the whole story though, is that both news sources report about the increased level of security at the marathon this year.  Fans aren’t allowed to carry backpacks, and there are almost twice as many police officers as there were at last years.  While this makes “logical sense” when first heard, it’s a tad confusing when you actually think about it.  Just because something happened last year doesn’t mean that anything will this year…so why such a drastic change in security? 
That’s basically the same as if a terrorist attack happened in the NHL Stanley Cup Finals one year and security was raised the next year, yet security at the World Series (a MUCH more popular event) would stay the same.  Doesn’t this seem a bit absurd?  Anyone who would want to attack would obviously know that doing something ‘new’ is smarter than trying to repeat a past attempt.  I’m not trying to say that there shouldn’t be security at the marathon, but it seems over-dramatic as is typical of most American events.  I believe that there should be the same level of security but that the ‘hoopla’ should be centered around last years victims and the country coming together rather than how much the police force is doing to prevent another attack. 

At the end of the day, unless you have the same level of security at every single event, there’s no way to legitimately prevent attacks.  Those who want to carry out evil acts will find a way around the system; they always do which is why attacks keep happening.  It leads me to wonder if this would be the same in Ireland or if the focus would be on remembering the lives of those who were lost?  I hope you never have to find out, but it’s an interesting twist on sports coverage in American media.

Links to both stories:

No comments:

Post a Comment